The ouster of Morsi in Egypt which began with massive
demonstrations in Tahrir square, followed by the military arresting him along
with some leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood, has created a labeling crisis for
the left and the left over Marxists.
They are busy carrying their labels, where is the bourgeoisie,
where is the class line in order to avoid crossing them, can the Egypt
upheavals even be called a revolution at all when the masses in Tahrir square
cheer the military for the ouster of a democratically elected Morsi. With each leftist sticking to his/her own
favorite labels they find themselves all over the political landscape, some supporting the secularists in Tahrir
square and some supporting the Muslim brotherhood.
Some are even saying this is too dirty and bloody, and they will wait it out for
the next "real" revolution in Egypt.
Well, that is typical of them. Real events always disturb their pre
conceived notions and they cannot see the forest because of the trees.
What is clear is that the central problem of the Middle East is
neither "imperialism", "bourgeoisie" or the military. It is the archaic social relations resistant
to the western influences that are holding back progress. This has taken a political form under the
guise of preserving Islam. In Iran it is
the Islamic Republic, in Egypt it is Muslim Brotherhood and in Turkey it is the
Justice and Development Party, each
posing their own forms of obstacles in the region and the world.
In the case of Egypt, should one support the secularists of Tahrir square? Yes, obviously one
should. Should one cheer for the
military intervention the same as the crowd did in Tahrir square? Yes, obviously one should. Isn't this the same military who was
persecuting any kind of anti Mubarak views in the past? Yes and no.
Yes this military has roots in that past, but it also forced Mubarak
out. Could this military turn against
the secularists? It is possible but not
very probable, but that is a bridge that the secularists have to cross when
they get there, if they get there.
Was Morsi elected by the majority vote and what will happen
to the democracy in Egypt? He was
elected by majority vote and Muslims again have proven that the majority vote
for them is to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of the population and
turn that vote to a one time vote. In
the context of the Middle East this Muslim political agenda is the most
anti-democratic agenda possible and stopping Morsi in his tracks was the only
democratic course that was possible.
There is a rough road ahead for the Egyptians to stabilize their
new born freedoms. Blood will be shed
and the leftists in the West will have a heyday placating the web with those
bloody pictures, some fabricated, with their ideological labels firmly affixed
to them. Fortunately, the Egyptian
secularists are not paying much attention to it.
Oh, by the way, was it a coup by the military after all? It does not matter, take your pick.
No comments:
Post a Comment